PWInsider - WWE News, Wrestling News, WWE

PUCK.NEWS COVERS IMPENDING WWE STOCKHOLDERS LAWSUIT OVER WWE SALE TO ENDEAVOR, CREATION OF TKO

Entertainment publication Puck.News covered the impending Delaware trial challenging WWE’s $21 billion merger with UFC to form TKO Group Holdings, which is scheduled to kick off this June.

In the civil lawsuit, WWE shareholders have alleged that Vince McMahon manipulated the sale process to favor Ari Emanuel’s Endeavor, potentially undervaluing WWE and securing his own position rather than maximizing shareholder value.

The case is rooted in McMahon’s 2022 return to power after the sexual misconduct scandal involving $12 million in hush money. The plaintiffs argue that even before WWE was formally on the market, McMahon was already aligning with Emanuel, suggesting the process was compromised from the outset. They also claim WWE’s board failed to properly consider or negotiate with other bidders (including Tony Khan, Liberty Media, and KKR) and did not allow a vote from independent shareholders.

The article notes, "Among the most striking artifacts: a September 2022 voice memo in which Ari tried to reassure McMahon by saying he’d spoken with his apparently well-connected lawyer at Latham & Watkins. “Just F.Y.I., everyone at the D.O.J. is former Latham lawyers,” said Ari, adding that an S.E.C. civil inquiry into [McMahon's] hush-money payments was a separate matter, but manageable. “Yes, we can indemnify you and we will,” Ari allegedly said. (At a December deposition, Ari said he couldn’t recall making the offer.)"

At the heart of the dispute is the valuation of WWE at the time of the merger. Shareholders contend WWE was undervalued using conservative projections for future media rights, potentially costing them up to $957 million in damages. They argue that WWE should have received a larger stake in TKO (53–57%) instead of 49%. Defendants counter that their projections were reasonable and that plaintiffs are overstating WWE’s value while underestimating UFC’s strengths and merger synergies.

Another key legal battle is whether post-merger developments, such as WWE’s major media deals with Netflix and NBCUniversal, can be used as evidence. Defendants are arguing these deals validate their original assumptions.  The plaintiffs argue they are irrelevant hindsight.

The Puck piece also highlights WWE’s strong post-merger performance while raising a central question: were these outcomes a result of the merger strategy led by Ari Emanuel and his team or did shareholders lose out due to a flawed and potentially self-serving sale process?

If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!

• Tweet