You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q&A by clicking here.
Daniel Bryan finds some way to get into the match at TLC. We have a triple threat with Cena, Orton and Bryan. Bryan wins both titles. Thoughts (though it probably won’t happen)?
No way that is happening. It would be great if it did, but I don't see them suddenly getting common sense over in WWE Creative.
What do you think the chances are that this whole corporate Kane angle may be a set up to a possible HHH/Kane vs. HBK/Undertaker match at WM30? With Undertaker's physical condition and Shawn making clear he would come back if needed it seems to make the most sense. (Plus HBK's beer belly seems to be all but gone. Getting in shape for something?) Almost a brothers vs. brothers match. And besides it keeps the streak intact with Shawn not wanting Hunter to do what he couldn't. And besides who wants WM30 without Mr. Wrestlemania!
I don't see it happening. I think at this point if they are bringing HBK back it will be to take on Daniel Bryan. Keep in mind, they are short on top names and they don't want to use the ones they have in a tag match when they can do four singles matches with them. They have four hours, at least, to fill on Mania.
Hey there, I appreciate you folks at PWInsider for the work you do, but I want to know what do you think about Roman Reigns spear, it looks really powerful on camera, but do you think that it's any where near powerful as Rhyno's or Goldberg's spears?
Sure it's a great move. He does it well.
So with WWE’s propensity for lack of finishes at PPVs, and Cena facing Orton in a TLC match, it’s pretty much a forgone conclusion that the 2 men will both climb the ladder and come down with a separate title, keeping the unification from happening. Perhaps they switch belts and Cena becomes WWE Champion again. What are the odds of having a unified champion after the TLC PPV?
I wouldn't be surprised at all if they have the unification match at WrestleMania. It makes a lot more sense to have a match "12 years in the making" happen at the biggest show of the year instead of after less than a month of build up.
What do you guys think the chances are that WWE took Daniel Bryan out of the main event / title picture because they wanted to work him & C.M. Punk up towards a slow build towards 'Mania 30? It seems like they are using a similar formula that they used to use back in the early to mid '90s where they would pair a couple of workers @ Survivor Series, then have one win the title along the way to Mania, while the other wins the the Rumble & then on we go to the big show. Has there been any word or discussion about them facing off @ XXX? I can't think of really any other match that would be big enough or important enough for the THIRTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF WRESTLMANIA other than Taker retiring. (They even booked the Superdome!)
That isn't the reason. They took him out of the main event picture because Vince McMahon doesn't think he is a top tier talent. What we saw with him in the storyline is based on Vince's reality.
You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q&A by clicking here.
If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!