PWInsider - WWE News, Wrestling News, WWE

 
 

WWE ADDING NEW TITLE, WHY JONAH HILL WASN'T ON RAW AND MORE

By Mike Johnson on 2011-11-26 10:00:00

NXT and Superstars are not available in my country (which sucks) so I always read the report and thoughts here on PWINSIDER.COM . The shows sound awesome and if it is one thing they might benefit from, is a belt. I don’t think that any of the big belts (WWE, WHC, IC or US) should be on the show. What about bringing in a NEW belt, say a World Youth Championship and that belt has the stipulation that you could not have held any of the big belts before? It should give guys like Tyson Kidd, Yoshi Tatsu and Trent Barreta oppurtunities to win a title and maybe defend it on PPV without throwing them in the deep end where they might be forgotten (like Drew McIntyre). Would it help generate interest in the regulars on the internet shows? Would WWE be willing to try that?

I think the last thing WWE needs is another new belt, but the idea of taking one of the minor belts and moving it there isn'ta bad idea.

So Daniel Bryan cashed in on SmackDown!, but despite the whole premise of the Money in the Bank contract being any place, any time to cash in, Teddy Long overruled a cash in? Seriously? That defeats the whole point of being able to "pick your spot" to cash in. I get that they're selling the leg of Mark Henry, but he's still the champion, and if he can't compete then he should be stripped of the title. This whole thing makes no sense. Everyone but RVD waited for the champion to be injured in some way and then cashed in, none of the champions were in any condition to compete yet the cash ins were all valid. Just seems stupid.

It's just the story they are trying to tell right now.  They don't care about the past when it comes to whatever story they are telling now.

Where was Jonah Hill? He was listed as the Guest Star on WWE.com and they had a whole article on it and yet he never showed up.

The story was that the company pre-taped the appearances and then they didn't use them.  They were taped weeks in advance in Los Angeles.

Is there any hope for the WWE Divas division? Two minute matches if they even get a match, as seen by the WWE '12 plug that incorporated the divas into it. I really feel that if they took the time to really work with the divas, even work with some of them in certain areas so the matches were a bit more fluid they could have a decent division, instead we see matches where it's either do all of your signatures and spots or just have Natalya yell, "Are you gunna cry!?" for most of the match and then get rolled up.

Right now, it's going to be whatever it is.  The company doesn't see the Divas as a main event drawing division.

I noticed that during the 10 women Gauntlet match on Impact Wrestling ODB took part in the match but not Jacqueline. Why wasn't Jacqueline in the Gauntlet match? As a matter of fact Ink, Inc. member Toxxin (Cristina Von Eerie) was not there either. Any idea why?

They just weren't booked in the match.

 

If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!