PWInsider - WWE News, Wrestling News, WWE

 
 

WHAT NOT TO DO WITH ROMAN REIGNS, ENZO AND CASS' REACTION, HOW TO SEND UNDERTAKER OFF AND MORE

By Dave Scherer on 2016-04-18 10:00:00

You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q and A by clicking here.

I want Roman Reigns to slowly be built into a full blown heel. What do you think of this scenario?  Samoa Joe attacks AJ Styles in his match with Roman Reigns and eventually we find out Reigns has employed Samoa Joe to watch his back.  This could lead to an amazing AJ Styles vs. Samoa Joe feud on a grander scale. And imagine Dean Ambrose trying to talk some sense into Roman Reigns with the help of the Usos only to have the entire Samoan stable destroy Ambrose and Reigns informing Dean that they are not and never will be brothers. Wrestlemania 33 main event???

I hate it.  Roman is a big, tough guy.  He doesn’t need anyone to watch his back.  Part of the reason WWE doesn’t get heels over is because they make them cowards and babies.  I hate that aspect of the booking so I would hate if they did it to Roman.

I don't watch NXT, so excuse me if this sounds dumb, But on Raw came Enzo and Cass. I found them extremely annoying; were they like that in NXT, is this a new character, or is it just me?

It’s just you.  If you listened to the crowd in LA, they obviously disagree with you.  I do as well.  I like Enzo and Cass.

I like this tag team tournament idea. But will anyone really be surprised if it comes down to The Dudleys vs The Usos?

I would be.  In fact, I would be shocked if it comes down to those two teams.  This is an opportunity to create new stars.  I think that is what WWE will do.

After watching Taker V Shane at Mania, and seeing Taker removing his gloves as a sign of what some are saying was retirement, do you think THAT is how WWE will explain Shane running RAW? It could be something like Taker pushed Vince into it out of respect for Shane, saying something like Shane beat him in to retirement, even if Taker won the match. Far fetched? Maybe, but it's not like WWE doesn't do some really strange things from time to time.

No, I think the explanations that we have gotten the last two weeks are what they have planned.  I wouldn’t be shocked to see Vince say tonight that Shane has done such a good job, he is in charge of Smackdown though.  And Shane is advertised for the show.  Hmm….

I have heard it is a tradition that when a wrestler retires, no matter who they are or how many years they have been doing it, they lose their final match.  Do you think that since Undertaker is more or less in a league by himself and so well respected in and out of the industry he will be asked to lose his final match assuming he has one?  Personally speaking, I think Taker would be the one guy who everyone who is asked would not care and give him a pass on it and not care but wonder what you think. 

That is a pretty antiquated tradition, in my opinion.  I don’t think anyone has to lose their last match any more.  I have no problem with Taker going out on top, provided he doesn’t beat some young guy or the champion.

You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q and A by clicking here.

If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!