Want more wrestling news, rumors, and results? Be sure to visit PWInsider.com and PWInsiderXtra.com.
You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q and A by clicking here.
Is there a reason that continually past stars are being put over current by WWE? It was bad enough the League of Nations being fed to 3 50+ veterans, but then New Day also looked idiots by one taking a stunner and the other two doing nothing.
There is to Vince, and I get it to a degree. He knows that a lot of fans watch one show a year, and they want to see the guys they know show up and do something cool. But I am with you, when you what you have been pushing as the top heel group beat your tag champs and then get laid out by older guys, even if they are legends, it doesn’t give the younger guys a rub in my opinion. I am with you, Big E and Kofi should have gone after Austin for what he did.
I'm still struggling to come up with one good reason why they had Jericho beat Styles at Wrestlemania. I've thought long and hard and can't come up with anything, but is it possible the thinking was, Styles will become the #1 contender the next day on Raw so he doesn't need to win at Wrestemania? This still doesn't fully explain it, as Styles certainly needed the win and Jericho didn't, but it's as good a reason as I can think of.
I think your explanation is probably what they were thinking, at least in part. As I said earlier in the week, I prefer the number one contender to go in strong, with a win streak, but Vince feels differently.
What is with the recent trend of fans holding up gigantic pictures of people's faces? It is very distracting if these pictures are repeatedly held up on camera, in plain view. Do you think WWE needs to prohibit these signs, especially the ones that constantly appear on TV in the front rows?
Since I really don’t notice I will have to say that it’s not really that big of a deal to me. I tend to not focus on the crowd that much.
There were many logical flaws in the Shane/Undertaker storyline which have already been pointed out on this site, but the dumbest one was how even though Shane lost, he STILL got control of RAW! Why would they negate the whole point of the match by having Vince so easily give control of Raw to Shane?
Vince would say, “It was only for one night pal, in front of that crazy post Mania crowd of nuts!” But yes, it made no f’n sense for a guy to want to have Undertaker kill his son one day, then do exactly what he didn’t want to happen
Now that Wrestlemania 32 is in the books, it’s time to start speculating about Wrestlemania 33! I’m thinking that Garett Bischoff challenges the Undertaker to a Tower of Doom match for control of WCW. What’s your over/under on this happening?
Is Vince Russo on a pole, in a chicken suit? If so, I am lobbying for this match to main event in Orlando.
You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q and A by clicking here.
If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!
Bang On Casino
