PWInsider - WWE News, Wrestling News, WWE

 
 

PWINSIDER Q&A: HULK HOGAN'S MEMPHIS SHOW, THE FUTURE OF RING OF HONOR, DUSTIN RHODES & MORE

By Mike Johnson on 2007-04-29 10:02:00

My question is what do you see for the future of ROH? When I first started watching ROH it was filled with wrestlers I'd never previously heard of having red hot matches for a crowd that loved every minute of it. Promos, storyline & character all seemed to take a back seat & the emphasis was put on the in-ring product. In the recent past the product developed to the point where it boasted several big name / big game wrestlers on its roster. With all the recent departures has the company been hurt to the point where the product might never be as strong again, or can they do what they did in the first place & bring in 'undiscovered' talent to put on hot matches, fire up the live crowd & release DVDs wreslting fans want to see?

I think ROH's future is that it's always going to be exactly what you described, a place where all the emphasis is on the in-ring product. Since they are a small company giving hungry talents a chance to basically go all out in the ring, there is always going to be talent that is picked off and signed elsewhere because working for ROH at this point is like having a impressive degree on your resume - it gives you attention. Since ROH doesn't have contracts, it will likely see a continuing cycle where names come in, are built into "stars" of sort and over time, will depart. Thus far, this hasn't hurt the company, because I remember when Paul London departed several years ago, personally feeling ROH was going to be in trouble because he was their top babyface, but others like Samoa Joe quickly stepped up. Now, as the TNA talents leave, names like Roderick Strong, Takeshi Morishima, KENTA, and Bryan Danielson have stepped up. In time, those names will leave as well, but until the day comes where ROH is no longer cultivating new names, I think they will be fine. They have their DVD and merchandise arm to help prop them up and more often then not, the live shows are doing decent business. If they are selling out NYC without announcing any matches, they are doing something right.

After reading a recent question about Dustin Runnells' Seven chracter in WCW, it made me think about a storyline he had in WWE. They had him come out on Raw, denouce the Goldust character with him then buring the Goldust outfit, and go on to play a religious character with the line he's coming, making it to believe he was refering to god, only to turn out it was to have the Goldust character return in his feud with Val Venis and Terri. The question is, when they had Dustin denounce Goldust, was it originally planned to work out that he brings the character back, or did they do it because he wasn't getting over as himself?

That character was designed to spoof those who were coming out hard against WWE's product at the time, much like the RTC was a response to the Parents Television Council attacking WWE advertisers.

Are there any plans to release the Hulk Hogan vs. Paul Wight Memphis show on DVD?

As I reported yesterday, VH-1 and Memphis Wrestling both independently filmed the entire event. There are no announced plans, yet, to release it to the retail market, but it's a possibility for down the line.

I've just signed up for Elite membership which is so awesome and easily laid out. My questions are as follows. I've watched Hulk Hogan every week now on Memphis wrestling and watched his promo on his website www.hulkhogan.com. Is it me or without a script or angry with WWE does Hogan seem really charged. He seems to come across more as the legend Hulk Hogan, the greatest of all time rather than the broken down WWE version of Hogan where all they do is say can he do it one more time. Why do you think WWE portray him this way? My second question is, if the Hogan Memphis event drew 6000 as has been reported will this be seen as a success by Hogan and upset Vince McMahon? I personally think if Hogan did show's in New York and Canada or the UK where he is at his biggest he would have no problems having a good run.

WWE portrayed Hogan as an older special attraction because frankly, that's what he is for them. He wasn't going to be on Raw weekly and headlining PPVs anymore, so he shouldn't have been pushed as a stronger star than John Cena, Edge, HHH, etc. I do believe Hogan is fired up, and he's publicly stated he was upset about the Jillian Hall spoof of his daughter Brooke's singing career. The crowd size in Memphis was an estimate but no matter what the crowd was, WWE was upset that the show was taking place because they obviously don't want any potential competition to get a foothold.

I don't get it. Why does WWE offer a "special webcast offer" for their Pay-Per-Views, but they charge full price ($39.95)? I thought webcasts are supposed to be cheaper? And do that many people really buy it off the internet, the quality isn't usually that great (especially for full price).

I believe you get some extra matches for the cost as well, but the price is set by WWE because they believe that's a fair market price.

We also have a new Q and A up today on PWInsiderXtra.com today for those who want to read it.

You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q&A by clicking here.

If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!