PWInsider - WWE News, Wrestling News, WWE

PWINSIDER Q&A: UNDERTAKER'S STREAK, SECONDARY ECW CHAMPIONSHIPS, WWE ADDING ANOTHER PPV TO THE 'BIG FOUR' EVENTS & MORE

I think it's safe to say that the WWE isn't planning on having the Undertaker lose his first WrestleMania match anytime soon, if ever. If they were, they would have put Orton over a couple years ago. That being said, what about a draw? Don't worry, I'm not thinking about asking Taker to go an hour like in ROH. I'm talking about a Last Man Standing Match against Mr. Kennedy at WM 23. Taker just pinned Kennedy clean on the 11/3 Smackdown, so they can go away from this feud for a while and then revisit it at No Way Out (Kennedy screws Taker out of title shot per Booking 101 instructions). Then Taker and Kennedy knock each other out for the double count out in the Last Man Standing Match at WM 23. This way, Taker is still undefeated and Kennedy gets the huge rub from being the only guy to face the Deadman at WM and not lose. What do you think?

It's an interesting scenario, but I don't think WWE is going to put Undertaker into a situation where he has a disputed finish at Wrestlemania.

Did someone actually recently say Undertaker puts over new talent? WHO?

Most recently, Great Khali comes to mind.

With WWE adding so many new PPVs a year, do you see them making one of them part of the "big four", thus making five top events of the year? And if so, which of the current yearly PPVs do you think has the stature to be that one?

I don't, because if they wanted to have a major fifth event, they could have simply kept King of the Ring as a PPV entity. If I had to pick one event that would be their fifth most important event of the year, for the last two years, I'd go with ECW One Night Stand.

If ECW was extended from 1 hour to 2 hours, do you think WWE would add any more titles to the brand?

No, because they hardly do anything with the secondary titles in their other brands, so why would ECW, which is being patterned to be less and less of a standalone entity, be treated any differently?

Do you see WWE ever putting on one more Undertaker vs. Shawn Michaels or Undertaker vs. Mick Foley match?

I don't see Mick Foley wanting to tarnish the aura of the matches he's done with Undertaker, but if the right scenario presented itself, I could see Michaels vs. Undertaker taking place.

If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!

• Tweet