Answered on 10/28
Why doesn't WWE bring Jillian Hall to Raw? She can actually wrestle, and there's nothing for her to do on Smackdown anyway. Why not put her on the show with the Women's Title, so that Mickie James, Victoria and Melina can have another opponent with actual wrestling skills, instead of having to roll around with Candice and Torrie?
I suppose I could just be a wise guy and point out that you care about the Women's division a lot more than WWE does. The truth is, there is no rhyme or reason as to why WWE puts women who can actually have matches, like Jillian, on Smackdown when it obviously makes more sense to have them on the brand with a belt they can go after.
What in your mind was the worst WWF/E show in history in terms of storylines and matches?
The Great American Bash 2004 immediately springs to mind. This was the show that included such unmemorable classics as Kenzo Suzuki vs. Billy Gunn, Sable vs. Torrie Wilson, Mordecai vs. Bob Holly and Undertaker beating the Dudleys by himself and then burying Paul Bearer in concrete. Also JBL won the WWE Title from Eddie Guerrero in a bullrope match that saw the same tired finish that we've seen in bullrope/chain/strap matches for ten years (face knocks heel into winning corner while going for it himself).
Do you think the WWE is going to set up a new confrontation between Kane and the Undertaker?
Is the sky blue? With both of them being on the same brand again, it is inevitable that they will have a confrontation at some point.
Although Wrestlemania 4 may not be considered one of the greatest WM's. Could we see another PPV completely devoted to giving someone the Championship? It gives someone in one of the build up matches a chance to shine, and gives the winner of the Championship one of the biggest rubs they could ask for.
It's doubtful, to be honest. The feeling by some within WWE is that having a full tournament on Pay-per-view isn't a great idea, since it requires wrestlers to work multiple times in one night, and rather than having tired wrestlers in the main event, they can have fresh faces throughout the card. So, most of the time when you see tournaments on PPV, WWE keeps it to just the semifinals and finals on the PPV.
When and why did they stop announcing the time of the fall (or time of the matches) in MSG?
At some point in the mid-80's, say around 1988 or so, they just stopped doing it. Not sure why, other than the fact that they would often have "20-minute draws" that didn't go 20 minutes, so maybe they didn't want fans to have a frame of reference by announcing the time in other matches.
You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q&A by clicking here.
We also have a new Q and A up today on PWInsiderXtra.com.
If you are an Elite member of the new site, you can read it by clicking here.
If you are not an Elite member, you can read it by clicking here.
If you are an PWInsider.com Elite member and you want to find out how to join the new site (which is bargain priced at a dollar a month or less, depending on the subscription you choose), click here.
If you would like to become an Elite member to one or both of the sites, you can do so by clicking here.
For PWInsider.com Elite members who are not members of PWInsiderXtra.com, the questions from PWInsiderXtra.com will be archived in our weekly Elite newsletter.
If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!